Galileo Galilei and Fundamentalism Part I

I thought to write this message yesterday after watching the news about Galileo's Telescope 400th anniversary. Suddenly, I have remembered Galileo's life story because I have to admit that Galileo's life story is one of three stories which formulated my personal characters and my psychology. I think the reason of that because I believe in that sciences have no prophets because experiments and proofs are the prophets of all sciences not the humans. I will try to avoid mentioning the details of anything but I will do my best to make this message as a fundamental message to all earth members. I hope from the readers to make their own research about this topic and to use their insight because I believe in that all world problems arise from the ideology of fundamentalism.

--
So I will start from the end of the story and I will mention that in 2000, Pope John Paul II issued a formal apology for all the mistakes committed by some Catholics in the last 2000 years of the Catholic Church's history, including the trial of Galileo among others. The Galileo affair, in which Galileo Galilee came into conflict with the Catholic Church over his support of Copernican astronomy, is often considered a defining moment in the history of the relationship between religion and science.

--
The relation between religion, money, science and politics is a very old relation from my point of view which is usually used in a wrong way by nasty weak greedy people to achieve their own personal benefits through the sympathy of people to the concept of religion. Usually, they use the new people in any religion or the young people to achieve their own dreams because the new people and the young people in any religion are the most dangerous thing in any nation because they have the ability to do anything because really they do not understand because they are new in that religion or because they are young. Fundamentalism refers to a belief in a strict adherence to a set of basic principles which are often religious in nature. Sometimes it becomes as a reaction to perceived doctrinal compromises with modern social and political life.

-